What is a key component that an investigator's findings must include?

The primary focus of an investigator’s findings is to provide a clear and objective summary of the investigative findings that is backed by credible evidence. This ensures that the conclusions drawn during the investigation are reliable and can be substantiated through documented proof. A well-supported summary allows other stakeholders, such as legal entities or regulatory bodies, to understand the rationale behind the findings and the methods used to reach those conclusions.

Incorporating strong evidence into the summary not only enhances the credibility of the investigation but also aids in transparent decision-making processes. It reflects the integrity of the investigative process and ensures that opinions or interpretations are grounded in factual data rather than subjective observations.

While the other options might contain relevant information, they don't fulfill the fundamental requirement of summarizing findings with an evidence-based approach. For example, the investigator's opinion and the list of witnesses might add context but do not serve as the core component essential for the findings presentation. Similarly, specific medical facts can enrich the investigation but should complement, rather than substitute, the evidence-supported summary.