What should the CAC do if there is reason to believe a permit's continuance endangers public health?

The chosen answer, which indicates that the permit should be suspended without prior notice if there is reason to believe that its continuance endangers public health, is grounded in the principle of protecting public welfare. When there is an indication that a permit poses a risk to health, immediate action is necessary to prevent potential harm. The suspension serves as a precaution while a thorough investigation is conducted, prioritizing the safety of the community.

Utilizing this approach aligns with the responsibilities of regulatory bodies to ensure that permits are not merely administrative tools, but rather mechanisms that ensure public safety is not compromised. In scenarios where public health may be endangered, the prompt suspension of a permit can prevent further risk during the assessment phase, rather than waiting for concrete evidence from complaints or investigations, which may take time and could lead to continued or worsening conditions.

Taking such decisive action reflects a commitment to proactive risk management in environmental monitoring and regulatory oversight.